EVALUATION OF MUSTAHIK WELFARE THROUGH CIBEST AND SROI IN THE PRODUCTIVE ZAKAT PROGRAM AT LAZNAS DAARUT TAUHIID PEDULI EAST JAVA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/ijiefer202Keywords:
CIBEST, SROI, Productive Zakat UtilizationAbstract
Zakat plays a central role in creating theological relationships and social relationships. In the utilization of productive zakat, there are measuring tools for mustahik welfare and success, namely Center for Islamic Business and Economic Studies (CIBEST) and with Social Return on Investment (SROI). The purpose of this research is to analyze the model of productive zakat utilization, classification of mustahik and the technique of measuring the success of productive zakat utilization with Social Return on Investment (SROI) in the National Amil Zakat Institution DT Peduli East Java. The type of research used in this research is qualitative with a case study approach. The data sources obtained are primary (observation, interview) and secondary (documentation, books, journal publications and institutional reports). The analysis technique of this study is data reduction, data presentation, then conclusion drawing and verification. As for checking the validity of the data, it is carried out through the stages of observation and triangulation. The results of this study show that the efforts applied by LAZNAS DT Peduli East Java are considered quite good with a plan to create a continuation of productive zakat utilization using the CIBEST measuring instrument after receiving it which is classified in quadrant I (prosperous) as many as 21, quadrant II (material poverty) 5 households. For the measurement of the SROI value in the zakat utilization program given to mustahik is realized based on the ratio of present value, influence and input value of 1.25: 1. It means that the benefits created exceed the quantity of investment carried out so that the quantity of mustahik utilization programs has successfully experienced changes in income and is able to meet both material and spiritual needs and has a positive impact on stakeholders. In conclusion, the role of productive zakat in alleviating poverty is classified as good, increasing the income of mustahik which is classified as small and able to meet both material and spiritual needs.
Downloads
References
Adisasmita, R. (2011). Local Government Management. Graha Ilmu.
Afriyanti, L. (2021). Analysis of the Effect of BAZNAS Pariaman City's Productive Zakat on Poverty Reduction Based on the CIBEST Model. AL-AHKAM Journal, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15548/ALAHKAM.V12I1.2912
Aqbar, K., & Iskandar, A. (2019). Contextualisation of Umar bin Abdul Aziz's Zakat Policy in Zakat Collection and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia. Economic & Financial Studies, 3(3), 200. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31685/kek.v313.503
Arifin, S. (2024). Co-Existence of Zakat in Weaving Social Relations. https://uinsa.ac.id/blog/co-existence-zakat-dalam-merajut-hubungan-sosial
Armina, S. H. (2020). The Influence of Macroeconomic Variables on the Amount of Zakat Collection in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, 25(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.24912/JE.V25I2.652
Meaning of the word productive - Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online. Retrieved 25 December 2024, from https://kbbi.web.id/produktif
Bahreisy, S., & Bahreisy, S. (1998). Translation of Ibn Kathir's Brief Exegesis Volume IV (Rev. Ed.). Bina Ilmu. https://library.fip.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=5119
Beik, I. S., & Arsyianti, L. D. (2016a). Sharia Development Economics (Revised). Rajawali Pers.
Beik, I. S., & Arsyianti, L. D. (2016b). Measuring Zakat Impact On Proverty and Model Welfare Using CIBEST Model. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 1(2), 142–160.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Pustaka Belajar.
Dasangga, D. G., & Cahyono, E. F. (2020). The Analysis of The Role of Zakat on The poverty Alleviation Using CIBEST Model (Case Study of Rumah Gemilang Indonesia Kampus Surabaya). Journal of Islamic Economics Theory and Application, 7(6), 1060. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20206pp1060-1073
Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, Al-Qur’an and Translation (An-Nahl). (2019). Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/16?from=97&to=128
Dikuraisyin, B., Toriqirrama, F., & Ma’sum, M. A. (2022). Application of the Index and Quadrant-Based CIBEST Method in Empowering Communities in the Malang City Zakat Institution. Management of Zakat and Waqf Journal (MAZAWA), 4(1), 110–133.
Fuad, A., & Nugroho, K. S. (2014). Practical Guide to Qualitative Research, 1st edn (1st print). Graha Ilmu.
Halim, A. (2001). Regional Financial Management. UPP-AMP YKPN.
Indonesia, B. (2024). BI Rate Decreases by 25 Bps to 6.00%: Maintaining Stability, Strengthening Economic Growth. Bank Indonesia (Central Bank of the Republic of Indonesia). https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/news-release/Pages/sp_2620124.aspx
Makraja, F. (2024). Zakat as an Islamic Economic Instrument in Efforts to Eradicate Poverty in Indonesia. Journal of Sharia and Law, 3(1), 113–126. https://jom.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/jurnalfsh/login
Mawardi, I., Widiastuti, T., Mustofa, M. U. Al, & Hakimi, F. (2022). Analysing the impact of productive zakat on the welfare of zakat recipients. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2021-0145
Moloeng, L. J. (2016). Qualitative Research Methodology (Revised). PT Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung.
Mundzir, M., Muttaqin, Z., Nadia, M. A., & Muttaqin, A. (2024). Islamic Sociopreneurship: Prophetic Principles and BAZNAS’s Approach in Empowering Mustahik. Economica: Journal of Islamic Economics, 15(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.21580/ECONOMICA.2024.15.2.22509
Muslimah, S., Raihan, A., & Subagja, I. (2024). 2024 Population and Civil Registration Data: Islam is the Majority Religion in Indonesia, Practised by 245 Million People. KumparanNews. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/data-dukcapil-2024-islam-agama-mayoritas-di-indonesia-dianut-245-juta-jiwa-23Hnnzxwyq8
Purwohedi, U. (2016a). Social Return on Investment (SROI): A Technique for Measuring the Benefits/Impact of a Programme or Project (First Edition). Leutikaprio. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313919309_Social_Return_on_Investment_SROI_Sebuah_Teknik_untuk_Mengukur_Manfaat_Dampak_dari_Sebuah_Program_atau_Proyek
Purwohedi, U. (2016b). Social Return on Investment (SROI): A Technique for Measuring the Benefits of a Programme (First). Leutikaprio. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313919309_Social_Return_on_Investment_SROI_Sebuah_Teknik_untuk_Mengukur_Manfaat_Dampak_dari_Sebuah_Program_atau_Proyek
Puskas. (2024). Outlook Zakat Indonesia 2024. National Zakat Agency Strategic Studies Centre. https://www.puskasbaznas.com/publications/books/1857-buku-outlook-zakat-indonesia-2024
Qadir, A. (2001). Zakat: In Mahdah and Social Dimensions (Ed. 1, Cet). Raja Grafindo Persada.Shidieqy, H. A. (2001). Falsafah Hukum Islam. Pustaka Rizki Putra.
Suardi, D. (2021). The Meaning of Welfare from an Islamic Economic Perspective. Islamic Banking: Journal of Sharia Banking Thought and Development, 6(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.36908/ISBANK.V6I2.180
Sugiyono. (2009). Business Research Methods (Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches). Alfabeta.
Syamsuddien, D. I. (1994). Prototype of a Peaceful Country. Media Idaman Press.
Syauqi Beik, I. (2009). Analysis of the Role of Zakat in Reducing Poverty: A Case Study of Dompet Dhuafa Republika. Zakat & Empowering: Journal of Thoughts and Ideas, II.
Talib, N. H. A., Ahmad, J. I., Dawam, S. R. M., Din, M. M., Ahmad, A., Isa, N. B. M., & Ali, N. R. (2025). Evaluating The Impact Of Zakat: A Framework For Poverty Alleviation and Economic Growth. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices (IJEMP), 8(29), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.829019
Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Productive Zakat Management. (2011).
Zandri, L. P. (2020). Analysis of the Utilisation of Productive Zakat in Improving the Welfare of Mustahik Based on the CIBEST Model at IZI Yogyakarta and LAZIS YBW UII. 9–11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dina Anisya Rufaedah, Mustofa, Lilik Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
